Arbitrum New Protocols and Ideas

Grant proposals for "new protocols and ideas" encompass creating from scratch, enhancing infrastructure, adding functionalities, or migrating existing protocols to Arbitrum DAO, providing tangible value.

Status

Status

Closed

Status

Available

$246k

Vision and Criteria for Grant Proposals

The “new protocols and ideas” domain covers such a large and vast array of potential use cases. It can be quite difficult if not impossible to summarize it all, so a non-exhaustive list of in-scope projects includes:

In any of the scenarios mentioned above, or in any other cases, the end result should be a fully functional protocol/product, at least in its basic features, that users can engage with. The proposal’s scope must ultimately offer tangible value to the Arbitrum chain by producing a functional deliverable.

Milestone articulation: the milestones can be presented in either text or chart form. Regardless of the format, all milestones outlined in the following section should be included by the team in the proposal plan, complete with numbers and dates where applicable.

Audit requirement: ideally, the base product should be expanded upon only after it has been audited. If a new product is being built from scratch, planning for an audit is a requirement.


Criteria

Most approved grants fall within $10,000.00 to $150,000.00 in ARB tokens. Please refer to the (Grant Types)[https://arbitrumfoundation.notion.site/Grant-Types-b8d304453e804deba3a9abd058ed6daf] for more details on how much funding you can request. Larger grant requests are subject to a more rigorous assessment process, and in many cases, would be more appropriately sourced from other funding channels, including but not limited to VCs and/or going through the DAO governance process via a non-constitutional proposal for a grant from DAO Treasury.


Proposal review and evaluation rubric

Proposals in this domain are typically reviewed directly by the domain allocator. Depending on the proposal content, the domain allocator may consult with allocator(s) in relevant domain(s) and may invite other allocator(s) to provide additional review. The evaluation rubric consists of four items that are each scored from 0-5 points:

Proposals that score highly in the evaluation rubric are more likely to be funded, but there is no minimum threshold number of points for funding and no threshold that guarantees funding. Grant decisions are heavily influenced by the evaluation rubric but also take into consideration the balancing of project areas, grant sizes, and the community benefits of supporting a diversity of team sizes, from individuals to larger organizations. Further rubrics, specific to the proposal, might be evaluated by the domain allocator.


How to request for a grant: